When Whitney Leavitt and Mark Ballas announced a fan giveaway tied to their viral Wicked-themed dance on Dancing With The Stars, they thought they were simply returning the love. Instead, they triggered a network-level crackdown that ended their season—and possibly their shot at the Mirror Ball. The cancellation came on November 15, 2025, just days after their performance earned three perfect 10s, and just hours before their TikTok post went live. ABC and BBC Studios issued an immediate order: cancel it. No exceptions. No explanations. Just silence.
Why a Giveaway Became a Scandal
It wasn’t the prize—two tickets to a live DWTS show in Los Angeles—that set off alarms. It was the ask. Leavitt and Ballas had told fans to like, comment, and share the post to enter. For influencers like Leavitt, that’s standard practice. For DWTS, it’s a red line. The show’s rules explicitly forbid any form of vote solicitation, incentive-based engagement, or external promotion that could manipulate viewer voting. The network’s legal team had been monitoring contestant socials closely after last season’s vote-rigging allegations. This time, they moved fast. "We actually can't do a giveaway for the Dancing With The Stars live show," Leavitt said in the now-deleted TikTok video, her voice cracking. "It just really sucks because Mark and I just wanted to do something really special for you guys that have shown us so much support and love." She paused, then added, "We're gonna get creative." But the damage was done.Backlash Was Already Brewing
This wasn’t Leavitt’s first controversy. Back on October 21, 2025, during the Halloween Monsterthon, she and Ballas won over fan favorites Alix Earle and Valentin Chmerkovskiy. Viewers flooded Twitter with screenshots of the scores, calling it "judging bias." One fan wrote: "They danced like ghosts. She danced like a storm." The internet didn’t forget. By the time the giveaway dropped, Leavitt had already been labeled "the judge’s pet" by some online communities. Even her strong performances—four top-three finishes in five weeks—couldn’t offset the narrative. "It’s not about the dancing anymore," said Reality Tea reporter Chloe Cullens in a November 30, 2025 piece. "It’s about whether the audience believes she’s earned it. And right now, a lot of them don’t."
The Network’s Iron Grip
ABC and BBC Studios didn’t just shut down the giveaway—they issued a cease-and-desist to all DWTS contestants for similar promotions. "We’ve seen this before," said entertainment lawyer Rachel Nguyen, who’s advised multiple reality shows. "When influencers try to leverage their platform for voting advantages, it erodes trust in the entire system. The network’s job isn’t to be fair—it’s to be seen as fair." The rules are buried in contestant contracts, but they’re clear: no direct or indirect solicitation of votes. No contests. No raffles. No "tag a friend" giveaways. Even thanking fans with "enter to win tickets" is a violation. The networks don’t want the illusion of a meritocracy broken.Elimination: The Unspoken Consequence
On November 19, 2025, Leavitt and Ballas were eliminated during the DWTS season 34 semifinals—the final couple cut before the finale. It wasn’t the lowest score. It wasn’t the worst dance. But it was the most predictable. "We had a gut feeling," Leavitt told E! News’s Zuri Hall in an emotional post-elimination interview. "You can feel when the crowd’s not with you." Industry analysts confirmed the giveaway was the tipping point. "Fan votes play a major part in who wins the Mirror Ball," said Parade’s Madison Miller. "And when you’re perceived as trying to game the system—even if you’re not—it costs you more than points. It costs you heart." Ballas, a 10-season veteran, stayed quiet in public but posted on Instagram the next day: "Whitney should be in Chicago the Musical next." The comment wasn’t just a career suggestion—it was a quiet acknowledgment that her reality TV chapter had closed.
What This Means for Future Contestants
The fallout has sent ripples through the reality TV industry. Other shows—American Idol, The Voice, even Survivor—are reviewing their social media policies. Contestants are now being briefed with new guidelines: "Don’t thank fans publicly. Don’t offer anything. Don’t even hint." "It’s a lose-lose," said social media strategist Derek Lin. "If you don’t engage, you look cold. If you engage the way influencers normally do, you get punished. The system isn’t broken—it’s designed to keep control." For Leavitt, the journey began in August 2025 with a casting announcement that called her "a new kind of celebrity contestant." It ended with a quiet exit, a canceled giveaway, and a question no one wants to answer: Was she eliminated because she danced poorly—or because she dared to be real?Frequently Asked Questions
Why did ABC and BBC Studios cancel the giveaway?
ABC and BBC Studios intervened because the giveaway—offering tickets in exchange for social media engagement—violated Dancing With The Stars’ strict rule against any form of vote solicitation. Even indirect incentives, like "like and comment to enter," are prohibited under contestant contracts to preserve the integrity of viewer voting systems. The networks moved swiftly to avoid precedent-setting legal or public relations risks.
Did Whitney Leavitt actually try to buy votes?
There’s no evidence Leavitt tried to buy votes. The giveaway was a fan appreciation gesture, not a vote-buying scheme. But in the eyes of the network and many viewers, the *appearance* of influence mattered more than intent. The rules don’t distinguish between intent and perception—only action. That’s why even well-meaning promotions get shut down.
How did the controversy affect her voting numbers?
While exact vote totals aren’t public, multiple industry sources confirm a measurable drop in Leavitt’s fan engagement metrics after the giveaway backlash. Viewers who previously supported her for her dancing began posting comments like "no more bribes" or "she doesn’t deserve it." Her elimination in the semifinals—despite consistently ranking in the top three—was widely attributed to declining voter confidence, not performance quality.
What’s next for Whitney Leavitt after DWTS?
Mark Ballas suggested on Instagram that Leavitt should pursue a role in Chicago the Musical, a path that aligns with her dance background and stage presence. Though her DWTS run ended abruptly, her 1.2 million TikTok following and viral moments suggest a future in live entertainment, branding, or even musical theater. Her journey reflects a new reality: reality TV fame can be fleeting, but influence can evolve.
Has this happened before on DWTS?
Yes. In season 29, contestant and singer Tinashe was warned after posting a "vote for me" Instagram story with a link to a fan page. In season 31, a contestant was fined for running a Twitter giveaway for signed merchandise. But this is the first time a cancellation led directly to elimination. The network’s response this season signals a new level of enforcement—especially with influencer contestants who have massive social followings.
Why didn’t Mark Ballas get eliminated too?
Ballas, a veteran pro with 10 seasons under his belt, was not the subject of the controversy. He didn’t initiate the giveaway, didn’t post the TikTok, and barely spoke during the cancellation announcement. The network’s rules target celebrity contestants, not professionals. His reputation as a respected dancer shielded him from the same backlash—though he still faced the emotional consequence of being eliminated alongside Leavitt.